MOST COMMON MOBILE TESTING MYTHS

QA testing as well as code review are done during and right after web development to check and improve code quality and the general functioning of a web product. If you want high ratings for your application, mobile testing will help you achieve this. But be careful and don’t get mislead by misconceptions concerning mobile testing. We are here to burst the most common myths about mobile testing.

The myths of mobile testing
Myth #1: Testing is always performed after web development is over
Truth: Testings done after every development stage or after any considerable changes to the code are more effective than one general test done at the end on a completely developed web product. The earlier the quality assurance team is able to find errors, the earlier web developers can fix them and react to other test results, and the quicker the application is ready for market.

Myth #2: Running a test on one mobile device type is enough
Truth: Even the same device model will give different results when testing on different versions of its operating systems. That’s why you should test a variety of options. Testing on every gadget and device manufacturer would be ideal, but not affordable, so use as many as possible. Choose the 10-20 mobile devices that are the most popular among your target auditory. To do this you can use Google Analytics and track devices that your visitors use to come to your site, if your app is a convenient addition to a previously created website with extended options. So testing on a few dozens of the most used devices will insure that the majority of your users will be satisfied with your web product.

Myth #3: Emulation testing is as effective as device testing
Truth: Emulators represent brand-new devices that work at their best. However, the longer real people use real mobile devices, their battery life declines and their memory fills up. In addition, many other apps are usually running simultaneously in the background, and this slows down the speed.

So emulation testing don’t give real world data, as it don’t simulate real conditions and thus many aspects are not taken into consideration. It can be useful during the development itself in the early stages to give a precise picture of app performance quality. Nevertheless, pre-release final testing before market entry should be done on real devices with hardware.

Myth #4: Manual testing can always be replaced by automated testing
Truth: Both manual and automated testings are important aspects of the testing process which cover two big areas. Test automation saves time but it can’t be applied everywhere and is not desirable to substitute for human involvement for certain testing methods. Manual testing is better fitted to exploratory, usability and ad-hoc testing while automated testing works for regression, load and performance testing and for any repeated executions.

Myth #5: Code coverage is the ultimate measure of app quality
Truth: The percentage of code coverage is really an important metric, however it is not more important than testing other features like performance and security and most abundant workflows of application. If these key features fail, then code coverage won’t matter.

admin January 4, 2022

0 218 4 minutes read

A WordPress Commenter
Hi, this is a comment. To get started with moderating, editi...
Georgia Waltrip
Hi, this is a comment. To get started with moderating, editi...
Donald Allbright
Hi, this is a comment. To get started with moderating, editi...
Ivy Torres
Hi, this is a comment. To get started with moderating, editi...
Donald Allbright
Hi, this is a comment. To get started with moderating, editi...

MOST COMMON MOBILE TESTING MYTHS

admin

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

A Refined Seattle Restaurant, Hold the Table Linens

Bosch looking to smart devices to get ahead in the cloud

Nintendo Details Next Miitomo Update

admin

Subscribe to our mailing list to get the new updates!

KEY USER ENGAGEMENT METRICS FOR YOUR MOBILE PRODUCT

MORE website accessibility (a11y) ACCESSIBILITY (A11Y): HOW TO CHECK IT AND PROVIDE IT ON YOUR WEBSITE?

Related Articles

Controlling PWM fans with the Raspberry Pi CM4 IO Board’s EMC2301

Mini-ITX Seaberry adds 11 PCIe slots to a Raspberry Pi

Turing Pi 2: 4 Raspberry Pi nodes on a mini ITX board

Install Python 3.9 on Raspberry Pi OS or Debian 10 (for Ansible or other uses)

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

A Refined Seattle Restaurant, Hold the Table Linens

Bosch looking to smart devices to get ahead in the cloud

Nintendo Details Next Miitomo Update